Why DFT Outperforms ML Force Fields for Transition State Location
A systematic comparison of NEB-DFT vs. machine learning interatomic potentials for reaction barrier calculation on 60 elementary steps.
Read →Technical whitepapers, benchmark validation reports, and practitioner-oriented guidance on applying DFT to catalyst design, process chemistry, and materials discovery. Written for computational chemists, not for general audiences.
Covers NEB methodology, barrier height accuracy, and practical workflow for multi-step catalytic cycles in cross-coupling chemistry.
Request Download →Full MAE tables across 55 benchmark subsets. B3LYP-D4, ωB97X-D, PBE0-D3 versus CCSD(T)/CBS reference values.
View Benchmark Page →Guidance on functional selection for 3d, 4d, and 5d metals. When to use ωB97X-D vs B3LYP-D4 vs M06-2X and common pitfalls.
Request Download →A systematic comparison of NEB-DFT vs. machine learning interatomic potentials for reaction barrier calculation on 60 elementary steps.
Read →Benchmark study comparing two leading hybrid functionals across 40 Pd-catalyzed oxidative addition, transmetalation, and reductive elimination reactions.
Read →Tutorial: how to submit a single-structure optimization from a SMILES string through the Qchemvyx Python SDK and retrieve thermochemical results.
Read →